Xenophon told the huntsman to feed his hounds himself, and to do it while they were hungry, since a hound fed casually does not know to whom the food is due, while one fed in need “loves the giver” (Xenophon, trans. 1925, §7.12). Hutchinson (1848/1865) taught the down by throwing “a small piece of toast or meat” while giving the word, and held that “caresses and substantial rewards” are “far greater incentives to exertion than any fears of punishment.” The same book describes cavalry horses whose feeding time was announced by a pistol shot, which “soon changes a young horse’s first dread of the report into eager, joyous, expectation.” Counter-conditioning, in working detail, half a century before Pavlov published. Hammond (1882) built a whole curriculum around food and called it “Training vs. Breaking,” though he kept the whip for willful disobedience once training was finished.

Bugelski (1938) found rats still responding in extinction for as long as the click of the food magazine sounded. Keller and Marian Breland founded Animal Behavior Enterprises in 1943, named the bridging stimulus in the mid-1940s, and were teaching operant conditioning to dog trainers from 1944 (Bailey & Gillaspy, 2005). Skinner (1951) then published the entire procedure in Scientific American, using a toy metal cricket paired with food, preferring it to a whistle because of the breath needed before blowing. Karen Pryor dates clicker training to two presentations in May 1992 and credits Skinner and Keller Breland. She never claimed the invention. Others have claimed it for her, and for themselves.

These are only a few of the published sources on these topics, but they apply to many other “innovations” these days if we search for them. I would risk saying that even before any of these texts existed, someone had already applied them. Presentism cuts in both directions when we go looking for those people, because reading an older practitioner as a modern colleague grants him a framework he never had, and filing him away as pre-scientific discards a working knowledge that cost a lifetime with animals to acquire. Neither reading is dishonest, and both are the ordinary difficulty of looking backward with only today’s vocabulary to hand.

What has changed is the incentive to claim. Work now reaches people through channels that need novelty and are indifferent to continuity, and an idea offered as an improvement of something already known goes nowhere. The current paradigm asks for a discovery, a method, a name, a degree of grandiosity that nobody would sustain after a quick search about it. The cost extends beyond historical accuracy, as something quieter goes missing when work with a living animal is packaged for distribution, and the person doing it has to become larger than the work to be seen at all.

“Novelty” in dog training is close to a category error. Every generation believes it has surpassed the last, but the dog has not read the latest book or attended a specific seminar. Renaming something does not mean replacing it, and if anything had radically changed in kind rather than degree, the argument would be about the dog. It rarely is. Which leaves an uncomfortable question for anyone who teaches, writes, or posts: Can a field still transmit knowledge that makes no one famous?

References

Bailey, R. E., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2005). Operant psychology goes to the fair: Marian and Keller Breland in the popular press, 1947–1966. The Behavior Analyst, 28(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392110 (PDF: https://ivh.ku.dk/research-files/celat/Bailey_OpCondgotofair.pdf)

Bugelski, R. (1938). Extinction with and without sub-goal reinforcement. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 26, 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057091

Hammond, S. T. (1882). Practical dog training; or, Training vs. breaking. Forest and Stream Publishing. https://archive.org/details/practicaldogtrai00hammrich

Hutchinson, W. N. (1865). Dog breaking: The most expeditious, certain, and easy method (4th ed., rev. and enl.). John Murray. (Original work published 1848) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/47808

Skinner, B. F. (1951). How to teach animals. Scientific American, 185(6), 26–29. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-to-teach-animals/ (PDF: https://appstate.edu/~steelekm/classes/psy3214/Documents/Skinner1951.pdf)

Xenophon. (1925). On hunting (E. C. Marchant, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work c. 400–350 BC) https://topostext.org/work/796

Comments are not enabled on posts. To discuss an author’s post, you can reply directly to the email you receive if you are subscribed, or contact the author directly by clicking here.